Effect size and statistical power in the rodent fear conditioning literature - A systematic review

Carneiro, C. F. D. and Moulin, T. C. and Macleod, M. R. and Amaral, O. B.

PLoS One (2018) 13: e0196258

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196258

Abstract

Proposals to increase research reproducibility frequently call for focusing on effect sizes instead of p values, as well as for increasing the statistical power of experiments. However, it is unclear to what extent these two concepts are indeed taken into account in basic biomedical science. To study this in a real-case scenario, we performed a systematic review of effect sizes and statistical power in studies on learning of rodent fear conditioning, a widely used behavioral task to evaluate memory. Our search criteria yielded 410 experiments comparing control and treated groups in 122 articles. Interventions had a mean effect size of 29.5%, and amnesia caused by memory-impairing interventions was nearly always partial. Mean statistical power to detect the average effect size observed in well-powered experiments with significant differences (37.2%) was 65%, and was lower among studies with non-significant results. Only one article reported a sample size calculation, and our estimated sample size to achieve 80% power considering typical effect sizes and variances (15 animals per group) was reached in only 12.2% of experiments. Actual effect sizes correlated with effect size inferences made by readers on the basis of textual descriptions of results only when findings were non-significant, and neither effect size nor power correlated with study quality indicators, number of citations or impact factor of the publishing journal. In summary, effect sizes and statistical power have a wide distribution in the rodent fear conditioning literature, but do not seem to have a large influence on how results are described or cited. Failure to take these concepts into consideration might limit attempts to improve reproducibility in this field of science.

Citation

Carneiro, C. F. D., Moulin, T. C., Macleod, M. R., & Amaral, O. B. (2018). Effect size and statistical power in the rodent fear conditioning literature - A systematic review. PLoS One, 13(4), e0196258. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196258 Animals, Rats, Mice, Research Design, Sample Size, Rodentia, Models, Statistical, Reproducibility of Results, Journal Impact Factor, False Positive Reactions, *Conditioning, Psychological, *Fear, Statistics as Topic

Keywords

• Animals
• Rats
• Mice
• Research Design
• Sample Size
• Rodentia
• Models
• Statistical
• Reproducibility of Results
• Journal Impact Factor
• False Positive Reactions
• *Conditioning
• Psychological
• *Fear
• Statistics as Topic