VetSRev
Database of veterinary systematic reviews
Database of veterinary systematic reviews
Animals (Basel) (2020) 10:
DOI: 10.3390/ani10122347
This study is aimed at synthesizing all available evidence on vertical alveolar osteogenesis distraction (VAOD) in animal trials to determine whether the animal model used and its handling influence or not, and find which is the most appropriate animal model for this specific technique. This systematic review has been carried out following the PRISMA statements. Bibliographic sources have been consulted manually by two reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed using a version of the Newcastle-Ottawa-Scale (NOS). The selection criteria established by expert researchers were applied in order to decide which studies should be included in the review. Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Twenty-four of them had a high quality (score between 7 and 9), two medium quality (score between 4 and 6), and none low quality (score between 1 and 3). The highest possible score was 9 (using the NOS). Six studies complied with all NOS criteria. The animal model has been seen to influence the results, leading to failure in some cases. The most used animal model on VAOD, with fewer complications, was the Mongrel dog. The use of the pig and minipig is not recommended, due to the difficulties in handling and complications encountered.
García-González, M., Muñoz, F., González-Cantalapiedra, A., López-Peña, M., & Saulacic, N. (2020). Does the Animal Model Influence in Vertical Alveolar Distraction? A Systematic Review of the Literature. Animals (Basel), 10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122347 systematic review, animal model, alveolar ridge augmentation, animal experimentation, biomaterials, distraction osteogenesis, Vaod