VetSRev
Database of veterinary systematic reviews
Database of veterinary systematic reviews
Animals (Basel) (2021) 11:
DOI: 10.3390/ani11020342
In recent years, blood transfusions have been more commonly given to pets. The importance of determining blood groups in dogs and cats is, therefore, well-known for reducing the risk of adverse reactions in the recipient blood caused by a "non-compatible" donor. This systematic review summarizes data from previously published reports and follows the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for systematic reviews. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we identified 41 eligible studies using different states and blood-typing methods to determine blood groups in dogs. The dog blood groups that were identified between 1999 and 2020 in 17 different countries were combined to yield the DEA (Dog Erythrocyte Antigen), Kai, and Dal groups. These studies were conducted in Europe, America, Africa, and Asia but not in all the countries of these continents. The methods used to determine blood types have also changed over the years. This systematic review highlights gaps in the literature and should advance future studies synthesizing data with methodological rigor.
Mangiaterra, S., Rossi, G., Antognoni, M. T., Cerquetella, M., Marchegiani, A., Miglio, A., & Gavazza, A. (2021). Canine Blood Group Prevalence and Geographical Distribution around the World: An Updated Systematic Review. Animals (Basel), 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020342 Prevalence, meta-analysis, methodology, techniques, systematic reviews, data analysis, guidelines, pets, countries, adverse effects, systematic review, prevalence, geographical distribution, antigens, incidence, blood-typing assay, canine blood groups, blood transfusion, blood group antigens, blood groups, erythrocytes