The economics of pain management

Newton, H P and O’Connor, A M

Veterinary Clinics of North America. Food Animal Practice (2013) 29: 229–250

DOI: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2012.11.010

Abstract

Using castration and dehorning as the test base, this article evaluates whether pain management is associated with increased production and whether this motivates producers. The literature supporting increased production parameters is limited. Studies have evaluated short periods and often use few animals. Few studies are repeated and the potential for publication bias is high. There is little evidence that pain management is associated with increased production. This is a concern because survey data suggest producers are partly motivated based on economic factors. The unanswered question is whether economic incentive programs would be greater motivators than increased production.

Citation

Newton, H. P., & O’Connor, A. M. (2013). The economics of pain management. Veterinary Clinics of North America. Food Animal Practice, 29(1), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2012.11.010 Animals, Cattle, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Animal Welfare/economics, Horns/surgery, Orchiectomy/adverse effects/veterinary, Pain Management/economics/veterinary

Keywords

• Animals
• Cattle
• Cost-Benefit Analysis
• Animal Welfare/economics
• Horns/surgery
• Orchiectomy/adverse effects/veterinary
• Pain Management/economics/veterinary