logo

VetSRev

A meta-analysis of essential oils use for beef cattle feed: rumen fermentation, blood metabolites, meat quality, performance and, environmental and economic impact.

Orzuna-Orzuna, J. F. and Dorantes-Iturbide, G. and Lara-Bueno, A. and Miranda-Romero, L. A. and Mendoza-Martinez, G. D. and Santiago-Figueroa, I.

Fermentation (2022) 8:

DOI: 10.3390/fermentation8060254

Abstract

The objective of this study was to see how dietary supplementation with essential oils (EOs) affected rumen fermentation, blood metabolites, growth performance and meat quality of beef cattle through a meta-analysis. In addition, a simulation analysis was conducted to evaluate the effects of EOs on the economic and environmental impact of beef production. Data were extracted from 34 peer-reviewed studies and analyzed using random-effects statistical models to assess the weighted mean difference (WMD) between control and EOs treatments. Dietary supplementation of EOs increased (p \textless 0.01) dry matter intake (WMD = 0.209 kg/d), final body weight (WMD = 12.843 kg), daily weight gain (WMD = 0.087 kg/d), feed efficiency (WMD = 0.004 kg/kg), hot carcass weight (WMD = 5.45 kg), and Longissimus dorsi muscle area (WMD = 3.48 cm2). Lower (p \textless 0.05) ruminal concentration of ammonia nitrogen (WMD = -1.18 mg/dL), acetate (WMD = -4.37 mol/100 mol) and total protozoa (WMD = -2.17 x 105/mL), and higher concentration of propionate (WMD = 0.878 mol/100 mol, p \textless 0.001) were observed in response to EOs supplementation. Serum urea concentration (WMD = -1.35 mg/dL, p = 0.026) and haptoglobin (WMD = -39.67 g/mL, p = 0.031) were lower in cattle supplemented with EOs. In meat, EOs supplementation reduced (p \textless 0.001) cooking loss (WMD = -61.765 g/kg), shear force (WMD = -0.211 kgf/cm2), and malondialdehyde content (WMD = -0.040 mg/kg), but did not affect pH, color (L* a* and b*), or chemical composition (p \textgreater 0.05). Simulation analysis showed that EOs increased economic income by 1.44% and reduced the environmental footprint by 0.83%. In conclusion, dietary supplementation of EOs improves productive performance and rumen fermentation, while increasing the economic profitability and reducing the environmental impact of beef cattle. In addition, supplementation with EOs improves beef tenderness and oxidative stability.

Citation

Orzuna-Orzuna, J. F., Dorantes-Iturbide, G., Lara-Bueno, A., Miranda-Romero, L. A., Mendoza-Martinez, G. D., & Santiago-Figueroa, I. (2022). A meta-analysis of essential oils use for beef cattle feed: rumen fermentation, blood metabolites, meat quality, performance and, environmental and economic impact. Fermentation, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8060254 Cattle, Meat, meta-analysis, beef, beef cattle, liveweight gain, cattle feeding, diets, rumen, blood chemistry, chemical composition, dry matter, essential oils, rumen fermentation, growth rate, feed conversion efficiency, feed intake, environmental impact, metabolites, performance, plant composition, plant extracts, pH, beef production, nitrogen, Fermentation, simulation models, physicochemical properties, economic impact, meat composition, beef quality, profitability, rumen flora, shear, acetic acid, propionic acid, rumen protozoa, colour, ammonium nitrogen, malondialdehyde, Oils, Volatile, cooking losses, haptoglobins

Keywords