The effects of assistance dogs on psychosocial health and wellbeing: A systematic literature review

Rodriguez, K. E. and Greer, J. and Yatcilla, J. K. and Beck, A. M. and O’Haire, M. E.

PLoS One (2020) 15: e0243302

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243302

Abstract

Beyond the functional tasks that assistance dogs are trained for, there is growing literature describing their benefits on the psychosocial health and wellbeing of their handlers. However, this research is not only widely disparate but, despite its growth, has not been reviewed since 2012. Our objective was to identify, summarize, and methodologically evaluate studies quantifying the psychosocial effects of assistance dogs for individuals with physical disabilities. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted across seven electronic databases. Records were independently screened by two authors. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they assessed outcomes from guide, hearing, medical, or mobility service dogs, if they collected original data on handlers’ psychosocial functioning, and if the outcome was measured quantitatively with a validated, standardized measure. Studies on psychiatric service dogs, emotional support dogs, and pet dogs were excluded. Of 1,830 records screened, 24 articles were identified (12 publications, 12 theses) containing 27 studies (15 cross-sectional, 12 longitudinal). Studies assessed the effects of mobility (18), hearing (7), guide (4), and medical (2) assistance dog partnerships with an average sample size of N = 83. An analysis of 147 statistical comparisons across the domains of psychological health, quality of life, social health, and vitality found that 68% of comparisons were null, 30% were positive in the hypothesized direction, and 2% were negative. Positive outcomes included significant effects of having an assistance dog on psychological wellbeing, emotional functioning, self-esteem, and vitality. However, it is of note that several methodological weaknesses of the studies make it difficult to draw any definitive conclusions, including inadequate reporting and a failure to account for moderating or confounding variables. Future research will benefit from stronger methodological rigor and reporting to account for heterogeneity in both humans and assistance dogs as well as continued high-quality replication.

Citation

Rodriguez, K. E., Greer, J., Yatcilla, J. K., Beck, A. M., & O’Haire, M. E. (2020). The effects of assistance dogs on psychosocial health and wellbeing: A systematic literature review. PLoS One, 15(12), e0243302. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243302 Animals, Dogs, *Mental Health, *Service Animals, *Quality of Life, *Disabled Persons, *Emotions, *Self Concept

Keywords

• Animals
• Dogs
• *Mental Health
• *Service Animals
• *Quality of Life
• *Disabled Persons
• *Emotions
• *Self Concept