Efficacy of Minocycline in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Rodent and Clinical Studies

Sheng, Z. and Liu, Y. and Li, H. and Zheng, W. and Xia, B. and Zhang, X. and Yong, V. W. and Xue, M.

Front Neurol (2018) 9: 1103

DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01103

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of minocycline for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Background: While there have been meta-analysis that surveyed the efficacy of minocycline in the treatment of acute stroke, they have some methodological limitations. We performed a new systematic review which was distinct from previous one by adding new outcomes and including new studies. Methods: Document retrieval was executed through PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Stroke Center, NIH’s Clinical Trials, Current Controlled Trials, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal before Jan 2018. The data meeting the inclusion criteria were extracted. Before meta-analysis, publication bias and heterogeneity of included studies were surveyed. Random and fixed-effects models were employed to calculate pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Additionally, sensitivity and subgroup analyses were implemented. Result: For clinical studies, 4 trials with 201 patients in the minocycline group, and 195 patients in the control group met the inclusion criteria; 3 were randomized trials. At the end of 90-day follow up or discharge day, results showed that the groups receiving minocycline were superior to the control group, with significant differences in the NIHSS scores (mean difference [MD], -2.75; 95% CI, -4.78, 0.27; p = 0.03) and mRS scores (MD, -0.98; 95% CI, -1.27, -0.69; p \textless 0.01), but not Barthel Index Score (MD, 9.04; 95% CI, -0.78, 18.07; p = 0.07). For rodent experiments, 14 studies were included. Neurological severity scores (NSS) was significantly improved (MD, -1.38; 95% CI, -1.64, -1.31; p \textless 0.01) and infarct volume was obviously reduced (Std mean difference [SMD], -2.38; 95% CI, -3.40, -1.36; p \textless 0.01) in the minocycline group. Heterogeneity among the studies was proved to exist for infarct volume (Chi(2) = 116.12, p \textless 0.01; I(2) = 0.89) but not for other variables. Conclusions: Based on the results in our study, minocycline appears as an effective therapeutic option for acute ischemic stroke.

Citation

Sheng, Z., Liu, Y., Li, H., Zheng, W., Xia, B., Zhang, X., Yong, V. W., & Xue, M. (2018). Efficacy of Minocycline in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Rodent and Clinical Studies. Front Neurol, 9, 1103. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.01103 meta-analysis, ischemic stroke, clinical study, minocycline, rodent study

Keywords

• meta-analysis
• ischemic stroke
• clinical study
• minocycline
• rodent study