A meta-analysis of Animal Assisted Interventions targeting pain, anxiety and distress in medical settings

Waite, T. C. and Hamilton, L. and O’Brien, W.

Complement Ther Clin Pract (2018) 33: 49–55

DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.07.006

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Research suggests Animal Assisted Interventions (AAI) reduce negative outcomes in medical settings, but quantitative examinations of their effects on medical outcomes such as pain, anxiety, and distress are lacking. DESIGN: A comprehensive literature search and meta-analysis were conducted in which 22 studies (13 child, 9 adult) met inclusion criteria. Both intervention versus control and intervention pre-post effect sizes were computed using a random effects model. RESULTS: The overall intervention versus control effect size was large and significant (d = 1.65, 95% CI = 0.46-2.832). Similarly, the pre-post effect size was large and significant (d = 2.19, 95% CI = 0.74-3.64). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis indicate that AAI can yield large effects across a number of medically relevant outcomes. There is, however, substantial methodological variation across studies and more randomized clinical trials with stronger methodological controls are needed to establish the effectiveness of AAI compared to other interventions.

Citation

Waite, T. C., Hamilton, L., & O’Brien, W. (2018). A meta-analysis of Animal Assisted Interventions targeting pain, anxiety and distress in medical settings. Complement Ther Clin Pract, 33, 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.07.006 Adult, Humans, Child, Anxiety, Pain, *Animal Assisted Therapy, Stress, Psychological/*therapy, *Pain Management, Animal Assisted Interventions, Anxiety/*therapy, Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), Psychological distress

Keywords

• Adult
• Humans
• Child
• Anxiety
• Pain
• *Animal Assisted Therapy
• Stress
• Psychological/*therapy
• *Pain Management
• Animal Assisted Interventions
• Anxiety/*therapy
• Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM)
• Psychological distress