The application of knowledge synthesis methods in agri-food public health: recent advancements, challenges and opportunities

Young, I and Waddell, L and Sanchez, J and Wilhelm, B and McEwen, S A and Rajic, A

Preventive Veterinary Medicine (2014) 113:

DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.11.009

Abstract

Knowledge synthesis refers to the integration of findings from individual research studies on a given topic or question into the global knowledge base. The application of knowledge synthesis methods, particularly systematic reviews and meta-analysis, has increased considerably in the agri-food public health sector over the past decade and this trend is expected to continue. The objectives of our review were: (1) to describe the most promising knowledge synthesis methods and their applicability in agri-food public health, and (2) to summarize the recent advancements, challenges, and opportunities in the use of systematic review and meta-analysis methods in this sector. We performed a structured review of knowledge synthesis literature from various disciplines to address the first objective, and used comprehensive insights and experiences in applying these methods in the agri-food public health sector to inform the second objective. We describe five knowledge synthesis methods that can be used to address various agri-food public health questions or topics under different conditions and contexts. Scoping reviews describe the main characteristics and knowledge gaps in a broad research field and can be used to evaluate opportunities for prioritizing focused questions for related systematic reviews. Structured rapid reviews are streamlined systematic reviews conducted within a short timeframe to inform urgent decision-making. Mixed-method and qualitative reviews synthesize diverse sources of contextual knowledge (e.g. socio-cognitive, economic, and feasibility considerations). Systematic reviews are a structured and transparent method used to summarize and synthesize literature on a clearly-defined question, and meta-analysis is the statistical combination of data from multiple individual studies. We briefly describe and discuss key advancements in the use of systematic reviews and meta-analysis, including: risk-of-bias assessments; an overall quality-of-evidence approach; engagement of stakeholders; Bayesian, multivariate, and network meta-analysis; and synthesis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. We also highlight several challenges and opportunities in the conduct of systematic reviews (e.g. inclusion of grey literature, minimizing language bias, and optimizing search strategies) and meta-analysis (e.g. inclusion of observational studies and approaches to address the insufficient reporting of data and significant heterogeneity). Many of these developments have yet to be comprehensively applied and evaluated in an agri-food public health context, and more research is needed in this area. There is a need to strengthen knowledge synthesis capacity and infrastructure at the regional, national, and international levels in this sector to ensure that the best available knowledge is used to inform future decision-making about agri-food public health issues.

Citation

Young, I., Waddell, L., Sanchez, J., Wilhelm, B., McEwen, S. A., & Rajic, A. (2014). The application of knowledge synthesis methods in agri-food public health: recent advancements, challenges and opportunities. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 113(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.11.009 Female, Humans, Veterinary Medicine/methods, Review Literature as Topic, Meta-Analysis as Topic Public Health/methods

Keywords

• Female
• Humans
• Veterinary Medicine/methods
• Review Literature as Topic
• Meta-Analysis as Topic Public Health/methods